Peter Pellegrini’s transition to the presidency has failed to sever his ties with the political party Hlas-SD. Newly disclosed party statutes expose his continued influence, casting serious doubts on the integrity of political impartiality and the adherence to democratic norms.
Revelations of Significant Influence
Despite resigning as Hlas-SD chairman upon his inauguration, Pellegrini retains an unprecedented role within the party as “founding chairman.” This position, created explicitly for him, grants privileges far beyond symbolic recognition. According to the newly published statutes, Pellegrini has a direct say in Hlas’s electoral strategies, candidate selection, and coalition negotiations. Such powers, coupled with his constitutional role as a neutral head of state, have provoked accusations of undermining democratic norms.
The statutes also allow Pellegrini to participate in party meetings, influence policy decisions, and represent Hlas at significant domestic and international events. Critics argue that this dual role contradicts the principle of separation between political and constitutional authority, risking Slovakia’s credibility as a democracy.
A Dangerous Precedent
Pellegrini’s continued influence is a stark departure from the practices of his presidential predecessors, who distanced themselves from partisan politics to embody impartiality. By contrast, Hlas’s statutory amendments institutionalise Pellegrini’s authority within the party. Observers warn that this could set a dangerous precedent, where political leaders exploit legal loopholes to maintain control over political entities while occupying non-partisan roles.
Even more concerning, the statutes outline provisions for Pellegrini’s potential return to active party leadership, including as chairman, after his presidential term. Such strategic manoeuvres raise questions about the genuine separation of powers in Slovakia.
Broader Implications
Few European nations have experienced similar arrangements, and EU observers are paying close attention. Countries like Germany and France, which uphold strict standards for political impartiality in their presidencies, have expressed unease over Slovakia’s deviation from democratic norms. Analysts warn that this case could erode public trust and fuel perceptions of political manipulation.
At a time when Slovakia faces heightened scrutiny over governance and transparency, Pellegrini’s dual role threatens to undermine its democratic credentials. The controversy highlights the urgent need for clearer boundaries to safeguard the neutrality of constitutional offices.
Source: Michal Katuška | SME
