Markíza Restricts Debate Participation, Citing Policy Violations

Source: Instagram: michal__kovacic

Former journalist Michal Kovačič’s plans for an election-related livestream with broadcaster Viktor Vincze faced unexpected interference when Markíza declined permission for Vincze’s participation.

Kovačič, a former top host of Markíza’s flagship political show and a highly recognised figure in Slovak media, was dismissed by the channel after publicly alleging censorship. Known for his outspoken stance on journalistic freedom, he had intended to host a candid discussion on Instagram regarding the US election results, recreating a similar event he and Vincze held four years ago. However, just hours before the livestream, Markíza blocked Vincze’s participation, citing potential policy violations. This move has prompted scrutiny of Markíza’s influence over its employees’ external engagements.

Background of the Livestream
Kovačič, now working outside of Markíza, aimed to continue engaging with audiences on political issues by hosting an informal conversation with Vincze and former foreign minister Pavol Demeš. Markíza’s last-minute denial of permission for Vincze’s involvement raised questions about the station’s policy shifts and its restrictive influence on employees’ personal and professional activities. Kovačič commented that this incident echoed his own prior experiences with the channel’s management practices.

Markíza’s Response and Policy Concerns
Markíza responded to the planned livestream by stating that Vincze’s involvement would violate his employment contract and internal rules. They indicated that Vincze, who now serves as the union president for Markíza employees, had not requested the necessary internal approvals. According to Markíza, “Such actions may violate the Labour Code, employment terms, and other internal policies.” The channel further stressed that this incident emphasised the need for stricter adherence to internal guidelines, which are currently under review.

Union Leadership and Journalistic Integrity
As union president, Vincze finds himself navigating a complex role, balancing the push for editorial independence with compliance with Markíza’s evolving policies. His recent election, in his view, reflects employees’ desire for greater integrity in Markíza’s news coverage. Vincze reaffirmed his commitment to defending “journalistic principles that management has pledged to uphold.”

Markíza’s intervention in Vincze’s planned participation highlights a trend toward stricter controls on media employees’ activities outside official channels, raising concerns about journalistic autonomy under its employment terms.

Source: Matej Dedinský | Aktuality.sk