In a recent interview with Aktuality.sk, Smer MEP Katarína Roth Neveďalová articulated views that significantly align with Kremlin propaganda, challenging the democratic principles and liberal values of the European Union. Her statements, laden with pro-Russian rhetoric, raise concerns about foreign influence within Slovak politics and its implications for Slovakia’s democratic fabric.
Downplaying Russian Aggression and Legitimising Propaganda
Throughout the interview, Roth Neveďalová framed Russia’s invasion of Ukraine as a conflict with “rational reasons,” citing disputes over Crimea and Donbas as justification. This narrative closely mirrors Kremlin propaganda, which seeks to rationalise its illegal aggression under the guise of protecting ethnic Russians and ensuring geopolitical interests. Such rhetoric ignores Russia’s clear violation of international law and its devastating consequences, including tens of thousands of civilian deaths and widespread destruction.
The MEP’s reluctance to label Vladimir Putin an aggressor, instead deferring to “international institutions” to determine culpability, starkly contrasts with the clear condemnation issued by the International Criminal Court and the European Union. Her suggestion that the EU’s support for Ukraine is unsustainable and a burden on European taxpayers is a direct challenge to the collective stance of Western democracies, which view support for Ukraine as crucial to preserving European security.
Opposition to Democratic Unity on Ukraine Aid
Roth Neveďalová further criticised the EU’s financial aid to Ukraine, claiming it diverts resources from domestic policies like agriculture and R&D. Such arguments echo disinformation campaigns that seek to undermine public support for Ukraine by fostering resentment over economic costs. This stance dismisses the geopolitical stakes of the conflict and ignores the broader consequences of a Russian victory, which could embolden further aggression in Europe.
Her assertion that Ukraine is merely a “third country” for the EU and her dismissal of the potential for conflict escalation starkly reveal an isolationist perspective that downplays Slovakia’s obligations within NATO and the EU. Such rhetoric undermines the principle of collective defence and the broader democratic commitment to international solidarity against authoritarianism.
Extremism and Hybrid Influence
The interview also highlighted Roth Neveďalová’s associations with controversial figures, including extremist sympathisers. While she denied personal connections to far-right individuals, her openness to collaborations based on shared views demonstrates an unsettling willingness to engage with antidemocratic actors. This blurring of lines between ideological extremes poses a threat to the credibility and unity of Slovakia’s democratic institutions.
Strategic Ambiguity on Authoritarian Influence
Roth Neveďalová’s remarks on geopolitical strategy suggest a preference for a “neutral mediator” role for the EU, effectively advocating for appeasement. Her critique of EU conferences that excluded Russia and her emphasis on negotiating “stability” over accountability align with Moscow’s objective to avoid isolation and maintain influence over its neighbours. Such positions not only undermine Ukraine’s sovereignty but also weaken the EU’s ability to act decisively against authoritarian aggression.
Implications for Slovak Politics and EU Integrity
As a member of a governing party with growing influence in Slovakia, Roth Neveďalová’s comments raise significant questions about Slovakia’s commitment to European unity and the rule of law. Her alignment with Kremlin talking points risks eroding Slovakia’s standing within the EU and NATO, while emboldening domestic antidemocratic forces.
The interview underscores the importance of vigilance against foreign malign influence and the need for Slovakia’s civil society, media, and international partners to counter such narratives. The resilience of liberal democracy requires robust rebuttals to propaganda and a reaffirmation of shared democratic values.
Source: Matej Príbelský and Denisa Hopková | Aktuality.sk
